|
All right, everybody give me a
collective sigh as the pure, virgin territory of net searching is
forever sullied by the greedy profit driven motives of the major search
portals. Imagine! These companies actually want to make money. The
nerve!
In the past, I have maintained a precarious middle ground on the
question of whether search engines should charge for listings. While I
believe wholeheartedly in their right to make money for providing a
valuable service, I don't like to see revenue models that impact the
relevancy or thoroughness of the service's search results.
The fact is, however, that almost every directory and search engine has
introduced a pay to play policy. If search engines play an important
part in your online marketing program (as they should) the time has come
to set some budget aside to ensure the effectiveness and timeliness of
your listings. This week in NetProfit, I'll recap your
paid submission options and give you my opinion on the best use of
your hard earned advertising dollars. I'll also look at how paid
submissions will affect the Search Engine Optimization industry.
Can I Get Away without Paying?
Up until very recently, I would have said that it was possible to have
an effective search engine positioning campaign without paying a cent.
Through submissions to AltaVista, Google, Inktomi, Open Directory and
Go, it was possible to cover enough of the Web's major search portals to
allow you the option of ignoring the paid submission alternatives.
Inktomi's recent announcement of it's guaranteed indexing charge,
while not having a major impact on it's own, was enough to tip the
scales in favor of looking at paid submissions.
Today, while it's still possible to have an reasonably effective
positioning program without paid submissions, I believe the holes that
result from missing major search portals such as Yahoo, Looksmart and
Inktomi will definitely hurt your online presence in the long run. And
while most of the paid submission options offer a free alternative,
experience has shown us that your chances of getting a free listing are
very slim. Here's your options, divided into the "Must Haves" and The
"Nice to Haves".
The Must Haves
Yahoo - You can't
ignore Yahoo. Depending on which reports you look at, Yahoo generates
anywhere from 25% to 55% of all search engine traffic. We believe the
real number is around 30%. Regardless, you can't have a hole that big in
your online presence. Budget for the $199 Business Express Submission.
GoTo - As we mentioned in last week's
NetProfit, Goto has done an excellent job increasing awareness for
the top 3 listings for keyword phrases. The jury is still out on whether
people will click on these "sponsored links", but I would definitely
budget some "mad money" to try some relevant keywords and see what your
click-through rate is.
Inktomi - I admit it. I've
changed my mind (somewhat) on Inktomi's paid spidering guarantee charge.
On a previous
NetProfit I said that it wasn't worth the money to pay for the
guarantee for every page on your site. I still believe that, but I do
think it's worth the money to ensure that at least your index page is
continually spidered. I still have some big ethical reservations about
Inktomi's move and believe it will hurt them in the long run, but a
little insurance in this case won't cost you too much. A single page
will run $20 per year.
The Nice To Haves
Looksmart - Looksmart has been very aggressive in making sure their
directory results are featured on major search portals such as
AltaVista, MSN, iWon and Excite. Earlier this year
they did an end run around Open Directory by signing alliances with
Excite, MSN, AltaVista to provide directory results. Open Directory was
providing these results free of charge. Looksmart offered to split a
share of any $199 business express submissions fees that came through
the respective site. Predictably, money talked and Open Directory found
themselves out in the cold. While we haven't seen enough search engine
traffic generated from Looksmart to justify moving them into the "Must
Have" category, they are aggressively moving to capture some of Yahoo's
market share.
Depending on which one of Looksmart's partners you choose to use for
your express submission, you might also expedite your inclusion in their
search index. For instance, AltaVista automatically includes a URL
submission to their index with your Business Express submission.
NBCi (Snap) - NBCi's directory has followed in the footsteps of Yahoo
and Looksmart and now offers a paid "Promotion" program. NBCi operates a
little differently in that you can submit a site free of charge by
becoming a member. The submission will then reside in the "Members
Submitted" portion of the site. Then, if you want to be promoted into
the much higher profile "Top Sites" directory, you pay a one time fee of
$99 (to be increased to $199 on February 15) to be reviewed. If the
editor decides that your site is worthy, you'll be bumped up. To be
honest, there doesn't seem to be too stringent guidelines governing what
constitutes a "Top Site". I suspect if you pay your money and your site
is even marginally professional, you'll be accepted. To date, NBCi has
not generated impressive search traffic. I would consider NBCi to be a
marginal search portal contender.
Go Network - The Go Network also recently introduced at $199 Premium
Service Submission. Let me start by saying that we're not really sure
what you get for your money here. The details on the site are very
sketchy and our repeated calls to Go to try to clear it up have been
ignored. The main question is whether paying the $199 will guarantee a
site review by a Go Guide editor? For the purpose of this column, we're
assuming that it does.
With
Disney's revamp of the site, site entries in Go Guides are given
much higher prominence. Go's URL submission form indicates that your
$199 guarantees a 48 hour review by a Go Guide editor. Your ranking in
this high profile section will depend on how many stars you receive and
the alphabetical ranking of your site title. Go's package also includes
a weekly spidering guarantee.
I have several problems with Go's new package. First of all, Go Guide
editors are, in large part, volunteers. I think it's a little cheesy for
Go to be charging money to offer a service that is volunteer driven. How
long will it be before Open Directory takes a similar tact? Secondly,
the site seems to have been in a state of flux since the redesign.
Search results are often inconsistent. Finally, Go's traffic has also
been steadily declining over the past two years. Like NBCi, I would rank
Go as a marginal contender for your paid submission budget.
What's The Future of SEO?
Search engine optimization is still a fairly new industry. A lot of
questions have been asked about whether the appearance of paid
submissions will mark the end of optimization companies. I don't believe
so, for the following reasons:
First of all, none of these submission options, with the exception of
Goto, guarantees placement. You still need optimization of your site to
lift you from the ranks of the ignored to those all-important top 10 or
20 spots. This becomes even more important when you're paying money to
even be considered by the index.
Almost all of the paid directory submissions guarantee a review, not an
inclusion. At $199 a pop, this is not a process you want to learn by
trial and error. A little experience could save you a lot of money here.
It's still vitally important to have an effective keyword analysis.
Before you ever start directory or search engine submissions, you must
have a very clear idea of what your optimum keywords are. We'll be
talking more about picking keywords in next week's NetProfit.
At the bottom line, I believe it's more important than ever to use a
reputable Search Engine Optimization firm. It used to be that
submissions were free so you could afford the odd mistake. That's not
the case any longer. |